Skip to main content

Why we need Idealists?




"A man's value to the community depends primarily on how far his feelings, thoughts, and actions are directed towards promoting the good of his fellows."
                                                                                                                        -          Albert Einstein

The need for idealism is at its highest, more than ever. Why idealism?  History teaches us the power of idealism.  The world is inhabitable because of those endangered human species called "Idealists”.  Most of them are condemned to lead a difficult and pitiful life. Only a hand few are lucky to be appraised by fellow beings in their life time. They are guided by ideals rather than practicalities of worldly life and for that reason they are despised. But what the world never understood is that today's ideas are tomorrow's practicality.  An idealist is always viewed as impractical and unrealistic.  He is considered to be too naive for the real world. If not for them world would have been “Dante's Inferno". Only an idealist can be considerate towards fellow beings. Not that, others are incapable, but they choose not to.  It is in the nature of every life that his/hers first preference would be himself/herself. There is nothing wrong or odd about it. Hence people accept it without fuss. But on the other hand putting other's need before yourself is not natural; it’s something people aren't used to. So they will always be sceptic about it.

In the logical side, as an 'idea' there is a lot of shortcomings for idealism, let’s not ponder onto it. To an idealist, world is not what it is at present. For him it’s all about principles and values which would be perceived as unrealistic by others. The World, as we perceive, is the manifestation of ideas and people are run by principles which will do greater good. Our world is a hospitable place only because of their selfless, naive attitude. They are the purpose seekers.  "Mahatma Gandhi" is probably the best and most successful (of our age) of this rare class who worked hard and selflessly for the betterness of the world. But Gandhi was not the first; rather he belonged to a long lineage, not of blood but of ideals and thoughts, of greats like Buddha and Jesus Christ. Buddha was more rational among them, i would say. Plato is once again one of the most authoritative idealists from ancient Greece. For all of them "the idea" seemed much more real than the physical world and the actualisation of those ideals gives meaning to this world and purpose to their life. There is a clear distinction of what is right and what is wrong?
Courtesy:statusmind.com
The beauty of being an idealist is that there exists perfectness in everything. Altruistic behaviour is the corner stone of being an idealist. In modern days there are a few who chose their ideals high above their country and society. Likes of Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, Irom Sharmila and many others are somewhat fall in that category of modern idealists. They are all fighting for the embodiment of a concept what they thought is morally elating. Not just any concept or issue but the one which concerns the whole society. They are not the ones whose thoughts are dictated by narrow-mindedness. They don't fight for any group of people rather for the whole world.

For Snowden, snooping of NSA is violation of privacy and he couldn't be a part of it. It was against his conscience to be a part of such a crime and not doing anything after knowing about it.  His morality stood taller than his country's government and rule of law. In his view privacy is a birth right and in any circumstances one must not be denied of it.  One cannot blame a person for opening up a crime and the repercussion caused. Backlash happens because of the wrong which has already been done not because of its scrutiny made. Irom Sharmila a strong willed lady from North eastern India is fighting for the freedom of her people, who had been living under AFSPA declared by Indian government. She had been force feeding by the Army for the past 14 years. She stood for the freedom of fellow beings in north-eastern states, thus defying the Indian rule of law. If we try to judge them through our narrow eyed lens of ‘patriotism’, we would probably mistake them as traitors. Instead use a wider angle lens of ‘humanist’ and then we will find them with the real flamboyant colours of their ideals.
Courtesy:izquotes.com
 Humans can never kick-off a civilised society without idealists because they are the ones who’ll putdown the cornerstone, for the pragmatists to build on. He shows the way where he himself would be a stranger. He would be steered not by a 40%-reasoning but by a 60%- inner-call which he would want us all to trust. He'll do many stupid things in the run. But of course, who else would we trust if not the one who would do stupid things for us. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The bloodsucking Yakshi

When I was a kid, April and May fell in the list of my favourite months. Not because it's going to rain and there would be mud all around, but those are the months my cousins would be here at our family house, in our hometown in Kerala. Those are the memories I would cherish forever. My grand-mother has 5 offsprings, 4 boys and a girl. My father is the second eldest of five. Then, he was the only one staying in Kerala and everyone else was in different parts of India, a Pan-India Family one could say. We were all present, it's like Parliament, shouting, laughing, scolding children, people everywhere, busy doing their chores. An outsider entering the home can still go unnoticed. Life was less complicated then. We were just ........just ourselves. Everyone you valued dearly is with you. It's like, the world has shrunken to a square block of bricks and mortar. Now it's all feel like a fairy-tale, one of the best things about joint-family. We are all tired of day's...

Legacy of Balasaheb Thackeray

I hope everyone has noticed the excitement created by the death of Bala Saheb Thackeray. Its just fine if you want to pay tribute to Mr.Thackeray and call him a great visionary and all. India is a democratic country you have every right to do as you please as long as it doesn't obstruct someone else's right. But when Maharashtra govt. arrested two girls charging them, of hurting religious feelings(Section 295 (a)) and IT Act for posting anti-Thackeray comments in facebook, any man in his/her right mind would agree, they have over-stepped their boundary. What religion are they talking about, he is a political leader,whose motto was to carry off non-Maharashtriyans from Maharashtra. Actually what the girls did was, one among them posted some comment on facebook wall and the other girl liked it. Those remarks showed their anger against the "bandh"(strike) on the day of Thackeray's death. If that wasn't enough shiv sainiks vandalised one of the girl's uncle...

Long live humans

I always wondered by the fact that on what basis did they give Mr. Obama a Nobel peace prize. All that i can remember what he did is talking. Or is it because he wrote a book, then its definitely not a big deal at all. Even Paris Hilton did publish books. Any one can write a book now a days, if it is by a celebrity then its going to be a best seller even if it has blank pages. As far as i know you don't expect to acquire peace by talking, you need to do something for that. Even so i think he is much much better than Mr.Bush. In India we have a decent and respectable man as a PM but as we all know he doesn't have a say in any matter. He must stand up to his reputation. People think he is just a puppet in the hands of Congress. If we go to Italy it is worse in there. PM is a morally  deteriorated person. The man slept with almost every women he came across and is accused with paying money for underage sex. Still the guy is shameless. Another one is Mr.Gaddhafi who is not r...