Patriot
or Nationalist
Patriotism and
Nationalism are two sides of the same coin, like YIN & YANG. But
the line which separates them is so narrow and thin that one would
never be able to find the breach until it is too late. History is the
witness for that. Take the example of Turkish nationalism, which cost
many Albanians their precious life. It started just like any other
patriotic uprising, but when it started to equate religion with
nationality; nobody knew, until it exploded, in the form of an ethnic
cleansing, where Christian Albanians were murdered mercilessly. A
wise man always learns from other's mistake. We should also. The way
it is going in our country, people are confused and confused mind is
easy to manipulate. They don't know where and whom to turn, who is
genuine and who is foxy.
Our honourable PM pleads
for unity of our country. At the same moment others try to booby-trap
this by crying out just the opposite, in the name of religion and
caste. India has to be secular in nature. Nobody can deny the
diversity of India. Some hardcore Hindu nationalists are of the opine
that we should've been gone a Hindu country when Pakistan was formed.
I beg to differ, if they thought just throwing out all Muslims would
make India a Hindu nation of their dream, then they were mistaken.
This so called Hinduism in itself is a pandemonium. If you go from
North to western part or to the East or to the Central and Southern
tip of the continent, Hinduism will start to change its colour in
rituals, rites and the type of gods people preach etc. In northern
and central part, they are very conservative about Cow. But when one
go to extreme south and eastern part of India, beef is a daily menu.
There are many regional gods and goddesses are being introduced as
you go on. And the first and the most important of all, the language.
Every state in India was created on the basis of language, from
Kerala at the southern tip to Kashmir at the north. But in the
northern belt, like Uttar Pradesh(UP), Bihar, Madhya Pradesh,
Haryana, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, etc; Hindi is also spoken as
a second language. But when you go to central, southern, western and
eastern part languages differ. One will see lot many well established
languages. This language problem was always been there as a hindrance
for the unity of India. The first thing that gives you a sense of
belonging is the language. When you hear or see someone speaking your
language, you feel relieved. You can relate to him, among the
foreigners. It acted as a boon and a bane for India. Because of this
disconnect, caused by language, helped India from getting worse when
Hindu nationalism swept through the northern part of India. Even
though Hindi is the unofficial official-language of India, language
debate is a sleeping giant, if awaken, capable of doing great damage
to our unity itself.
courtesy:quotes.com |
It is never a healthy
practice to equate one particular religion or ethnicity with
nationality, which creates insecurity. But history repeatedly showed
us that that is the case with humans. Now a days some extreme Hindu
and Muslim organisations were chosen to take that path of hatred and
violence. They intentionally showcase handpicked events from the
history to quash the opposite party (since Hindus are a majority,
they practice this to demonise Muslim rulers). Hindu nationalists
call themselves patriots, they would have been correct if this was an
exclusively Hindu nation, but it is not. Their patriotism extends to
a certain group of people with in the country. They want India to be
rooted on religious text based morality and justice. Just like
Pakistan, which they despise the most. The height of insanity created
by hatred is so big that people are ready to barter their reasoning
and thinking ability with self-contradicting nonsense. They have more
than enough time to babble about the may or may not be scientific
facts, which they say, were there in the thousand year old "Vedas".
On the other side they are missing out all those great Indians who
sacrificed their life in the altar of science and for humanity. They
haven't shown interest in people like P.C Ray, H.J Bhabha, C.V Raman,
S. Ramanujan, Meghnad Saha etc who ignited the fire of Indian
scientific temper. What these hindutva-vaadis are talking about is a
vast land mass of Indian sub continent. It was a time when the notion
of India as a country as we conceived today was still a long way
ahead. The "Bharat varsha" mentioned in epics were never
inclusive of southern India.
Everyone should be
cognisant of History. It gives us a clear cut understanding of who we
are? And where we came from? We all must do a self introspective
study by comparing the history and the present. It would tell us
where do we stand now? According to that, we should put in our
collective effort to take our country forward. Our previous mistakes
shouldn't be repeated. It should be our log book. We are a young
democracy that too a stable one. Isn't that enough to be proud of.
How many democracies plunge into chaos around us, especially in Asia
and Africa. It is our choice to be a nationalist or a patriot. I
always wonder how people could skip such a simple logic- if something
leads to death, violence and hatred, it must have been wrong, Its no
rocket science. Religion and belief are personal matters; it must not
interfere with the nationhood. When organisations with a customised
outlook of culture, compatible only with their own versions of
narrow-mindedness, start to actively indulge in the process of nation
making, conditions arises which will clash with the people of
different viewpoints and cultural outlooks.
What, A.K Ramanujan
(famous poet, philologist, playwright etc) observed about India in
his collection of “Folktales from India” –“Whoever
speaks of Indian or India must hasten to add that India contains many
Indias” is very much germane.
Comments
Post a Comment